Another view of the Shedding Hypothesis

Post #724

Dr.

Pierre Kory, MD, MPA

recently posted about mRNA spike protein shedding, but I couldn’t help but to notice how the main symptoms match up with electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS). The main symptoms found by Dr. Kory were these:

“Menstrual abnormalities (by far), Decidual Cast shedding, Headaches, Tinnitus, Nosebleeds, Painless, inexplicable bruising, Dizziness, Brain Fog/Malaise, Skin Rashes”

But look at the similarity to a list of symptoms in a recent case report of someone with EHS:

Furthermore, even menstrual abnormalities and reduced progesterone (which may be related to the increased decidual cast shedding that Dr. Kory discovered) have been found as effects from exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMFs):

Easy bruising and nosebleeds could be due to either capillary fragility and/or coagulopathy that errs on the side of bleeding. And even that was found in an animal study:

In other words, the main symptoms discovered by Dr. Kory do also have a competing hypothesis to explain them. They might be due to shedding, but they might be due to a coordinated effort to sensitize the human population to EMFs for social control.

The shedding hypothesis requires the transfer of chemicals from one person to the next — and presumes that the transferred chemicals create the symptoms.

My hypothesis is that original injections tag you somehow, allowing for automated attack on your person by directed energy (such as radiofrequency waves or microwaves). If energy is directed at you, then those around you will be caught in the crossfire — they will develop symptoms also.

My hypothesis does not even require the COVID shot though, because the ability to target someone for directed energy attack is no longer just a theory. And a hybrid hypothesis is also possible: a combined chemical and electromagnetic attack.

A test to discriminate between these hypotheses could involve protective shielding against EMFs in half of the willing participants, while leaving the other half of participants susceptible to repeated injury due to ongoing electromagnetic harms.

But if the intelligence community is in on it, and if they can react by adjusting the directed energies (silently altering your study outcome), then you’d want to keep the trial a secret and make sure that you never publish anything about it online. Oops.