In this prior post, it was shown that the frequency of adverse event reports for select events such as myocarditis is more than 100 times higher for COVID shots than for any other individual vaccine. This would not be cause for concern if COVID shots were given out at rates more than about 50-100 times other vaccines.
To get rough perspective on the relative uptake of 24 months of COVID shots versus select vaccines, only historic data was found on my first search for it, so the peak yearly historic uptake levels were multiplied by two:
As most vaccines got close to 50 million in this rough estimate (flu shots got close to a quarter-billion), the indication is that COVID jabs were not given out at 50-100 times the rate of other vaccines, but only at about ~13 times the rate of other vaccines.
Becaues COVID shots have ~100 times the rate of adverse event reports for select serious adverse events, but they have it from only ~13 times the rate of uptake or coverage, the reporting ratios indicate that COVID shots are more than 7 times more dangerous to take into your body than are typical vaccines.
When compared to flu vaccines, taken at least a third as often as COVID shots, the picture is even worse:
COVID shots are estimated to be over 33 times more dangerous to take into your body than flu shots.
Reference
[COVID shots] — COVID-19 vaccine doses administered by manufacturer, United States. OWID. https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations
[historic data on other shots] — MedAlerts. https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/doses/
Excellent. Thanks again. Over a 10 year or 20 year period the flu shot has many more shots administered. And the overall adverse event reporting for the flu vs. Covid-19 for the history is VAERS was about 40:1 I believe, but I haven’t looked it at those numbers in the last six months and my memory is not nearly as good as your excellent research.