Because actual trials were unblinded early, effectively removing the contrast that you’d get from a control group, the evidence behind the experimental COVID jabs is faulty — and cannot be relied upon.
A natural experiment might work, where each nation serves as its own control group while you compare seasonal time windows before the experimental jabs were available versus after.
That’s essentially what I did here, using the OurWorldInData site to get excess death rates during each time window.
While admittedly “unfair” — here is one such comparison, using average daily excess death rates of the 29 most-populous nations (77% of the world) from 1 Mar 2020 to 30 Nov 2020 as contrasted against the first COVID winter (Dec-Feb):
Numbers across the bottom are the rankings regarding population size, so nations get smaller as you go to the right — though all nations showing had over 50 million persons in 2020.
Blue dots are the average daily excess death from COVID alone (prior to the experimental COVID jabs), while orange dots tend to include the COVID jabs — because they represent the winter months of Dec 2020, Jan 2021, and Feb 2021.
Here is the same graph with some markings on it:
You may be wondering why I highlighted those 5 regions, while leaving the most extreme increase in death — South Africa, the 25th largest nation — unmarked. But it’s because those will be the only 5 regions of the bunch to have seen some decrease in excess death as I try to make the comparison more “fair.”
For now, you can see that winter was almost always worse (orange dots almost always above blue), but that could represent both the introduction of the experimental COVID jab and the seasonal effect of winter.
To remove seasonality, I shifted the time window forward to the 9 months of Mar-Nov 2021, allowing for a comparison to the 9 months of COVID (Mar-Nov 2020):
The evidence suggests that, in 24 (83%) out of the 29 most-populous nations of the world, the experimental COVID jabs “made things worse.” To make the case, here is a copy of the graph with those same 5 regions from before marked:
In every region but those five, the excess death rate got worse after introduction of the experimental COVID jabs.
Here is a graph showing some uptake levels of experimental COVID jabs by 1 Mar 2021:
Notice how the 5 regions (United Kingdom, United States, Italy, France, and Mexico) are all represented in or near the top. By being “early adopters” of the experimental COVID jabs, much of the excess death attributable to the jab may have occurred prior to Mar 2021 in those 5 regions.
The UK had almost a third of the population jabbed with at least a first dose by 1 Mar 2021, and if many of those receiving COVID jabs died before then, they’d get counted among the winter deaths of the first graph at top.
I ran a dependent-samples t-test using each nation as its own control and there was a significant increase in excess death rates when Mar-Nov 2021 was contrasted against Mar-Nov 2020. The p-value was 0.0001.
Here are notes with gold markings whenever average daily excess death rates exceeded 4 daily excess deaths per million (4 DEDpM):
[click image to enlarge]