Economics of Great Reset, Part 2
Relative Share of Resource Allocation by Domestic Economic Agents
A healthy society is one where individual decision-making is not just allowed, but where it flourishes — i.e., where it grossly dominates over central decision-making.
When each person gets to make more choices, prosperity grows.
But adverse interests would like it if a central authority were allowed to make choices on your behalf — e.g., such as a government spending $30 billion on 1.2 billion doses of a potentially-dangerous injectable product (along with spending tons of taxpayer money on “perception management” regarding that product).
Back in the 1920’s, private-sector wages dwarfed government spending. Wage earners were outspending the government by 5:1. Even private investors spent twice what government was spending:
This graph shows relative shares, so that it always sums to 100%, but with different fractions of the total assigned to the 3 broad groups: private wage-earners (blue), private investors (red), and all-levels government (green).
But though 2020 was even worse, look what happened to who is controlling the spending (i.e., the economic decision-making) in the US economy still, in 2021:
The government share of spending is now over 2.5 times what private investors spend. It is even more than the sum total of all of the private workers in America. When the government is the predominant resource allocator, then you can no longer say that your society has a free market.
This phenomenon — a command economy where governments decide where most resources go — is the goal of those behind the Great Reset, and the bad actors behind it would like it even more if private individuals had even less of a say (even less wages).
That’s why they produce advertisements which say “You’ll own nothing, and be happy!” It’s because they intend to create a complete, totalitarian dictatorship, worldwide.
They may currently say, with a cracked smile, that they only want “a little more” control over things, such as whether you can travel long-distances, or whether a business can continue using fossil fuels, or whatever.
But make no mistake about it: their end-goal is a complete, totalitarian dictatorship — along with the unprecedented suffering which something like that (a worldwide dictatorship) will bring.
Reference
[$30 billion for what?] — How Much Could COVID-19 Vaccines Cost the U.S. After Commercialization? Dec 07, 2022. https://www.kff.org/coronavirus-covid-19/issue-brief/how-much-could-covid-19-vaccines-cost-the-u-s-after-commercialization/