A downside to COVID jabs is that they cause “immune imprinting” — which locks your immune system into a certain type of antibody response. It’s like the joke about the hammer: to a hammer, everything is a nail. That’s because a hammer cannot change itself, so that it is always only ever good for one thing: pounding nails.
But a healthy immune response is adaptive to new changes in infectious microorganisms, such as the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Instead of being just a hammer, a healthy immune system is an entire toolkit (hammer, screwdriver, wrench, etc.).
A good time to look for negative consequences of immune imprinting is when the disease evolves into a new variant, such as what happened when Omicron variant displaced all variants which came before it. In the graph below, Omicron is the tan-shaded area at right:
The dominant variant just prior to Omicron was Delta, but look how fast it got replaced. On 22 Nov 2021, Delta variant was 99.5% of all variants in circulation. By 3 Jan 2022, Omicron represented over 84% of all variants sequenced.
In this greatest-of-all change-ups with regard to COVID, having previously been jabbed with COVID jabs might be dangerous (due to having your immune system imprinted with a response to earlier variants only).
Have a look at what happened to adults under age 30 when Omicron broke out:
Those who were tripled-jabbed when Omicron broke out were 9 times as likely to die of COVID, compared to those remaining unjabbed. Even the double-dosed were twice as likely to die when Omicron broke out. It also happened in the very young (up to age 4):
Among the very young, those double-jabbed were 17 times more likely to die when Omicron broke out. And to make matters worse, COVID was never even a substantial health danger for the young. The fact that the high deaths weren’t sustained over time is no excuse for the harm.
What about when the next variant replaces Omicron?
It was never a good idea to try to “vaccinate” against a novel RNA virus to begin with, because that type of virus undergoes evolution (sustained mutation, passed on to progeny) at least every month, if not more frequently than that.
In just a single month, your vaccine “could” become worthless at best. It may not be the most probable outcome, but it is a possible outcome when attempting to “vaccinate” against a novel RNA virus.
Because it was never a good idea to begin with, it is time to stop it now. Just say “no” to risky and dangerous medical practices — likely “vaccinating” against novel RNA viruses — even if the government officials all seem to be recommending it.
Reference
[“new” RNA viruses every month] — Stern A, Andino R. Viral Evolution: It Is All About Mutations. Viral Pathogenesis. 2016:233–40. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800964-2.00017-3. Epub 2016 Feb 12. PMCID: PMC7149360. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7149360/