Steve Kirsch and Dr. Clare Craig analyzed Czech death data post-COVID shot. When using the summary number for those who are middle-aged, you find a Middle-Age Indication for Moderna Excess Death, or a M.A.I.M.E.D., for short:
The ratio that is formed by dividing the Moderna death rate — in yearly deaths per 100k, or YDP100k — by the Pfizer death rate (Column D above) tells you how the death rates match up. To keep analysis conservative, only those months where more Pfizer recipients had comorbidities (marked “sick” above) than Moderna were used.
This means that the extra death from Moderna cannot be blamed on comorbidities.
Because the amount of excess death after Moderna in relation to Pfizer is so high that it meets CDC’s criteria for a Safety Signal (a doubling in an adverse event rate), the evidence suggests that Moderna should be immediately pulled from the market until more investigation can determine why it appears to make people twice as likely to die.
CDC’s ‘safety stance’ up to at least 12 September 2023
…
If CDC were right — that COVID shots simultaneously make you less likely to die from COVID while also not making you any more likely to die from anything else — then COVID shots would decrease overall death rates among people who take them. But evidence compiled by The Economist on over 200 territories refutes that claim.
Here is the central estimate of average daily excess death per 100,000 for the entire world, with green and orange markings added:
After COVID shots had rolled out at the end of 2020, you get excess death higher than the average daily excess death of the 1957 Asian Flu pandemic for 2 full years (to the end of 2022). This shows that it is not plausible that COVID shots do not harm you, because if they were safe and beneficial, then excess death would not remain so high.
But critics may demand an accounting of the uncertainty involved, so here is the 95% lower bound on the estimate of average daily excess death per 100,000 for the entire world, again with green and orange markings added:
Notice how it wasn’t until 8 months after the COVID shots rolled out that this minimum estimate on excess deaths maxed out (middle of graph). Most people had become fully jabbed by that time. Also notice how this minimum estimate, at that point in time, is over twice as high as the average from the 1957 Asian Flu.
This shows that it is not possible that COVID shots do not harm you, because if they were safe and beneficial, then this statistical minimum estimate on excess death would not remain so high. When most people take something only beneficial, then you do not expect to find any persisting excess death (especially not this much of it).
Here is this “proof of harm” from COVID shots in its original format:
Reference
[Estimated daily excess deaths during COVID-19 per 100k people] — The Economist. https://ourworldindata.org/excess-mortality-covid
Great analysis. Agreed. At the very least every government that does not pull Moderna off the market should issue a warning that Moderna is twice as deadly as Pfizer for people ages 51-70.