In a prior post, it was shown that there are 49 kinds of COVID which all made it past the 1% threshold for variant predominance. But if SARS-CoV-2 has a lower mutation rate per nucleotide site — and even on a whole-genome basis — than does influenza, how can it even be possible for the rate of new COVID variants to be higher than the rate of new flu variants?
One explanation is that the COVID jabs increase the viral loads in those infected, giving more of a chance for a mutation to occur, even if the rate is lower than flu. That explanation was minimally explored in the last post.
This post shows COVID jabs increasing the susceptibility to COVID infections, using a crude measure: the change in the pool size of the Number At Risk from the Cleveland Clinic trial results:
As you can see, after the pool size for those at risk was assumed to have stabilized (after Day 112), the only way to lose pool size is for people to get infected. This assumes no attrition (no people dropping out of the study for personal reasons).
The “two-week” susceptibility to COVID infection was up to 50% higher in those who were jabbed — when compared to those not jabbed. This helps to explain how it is even possible for there to be “49 kinds of COVID” when SARS-CoV-2 only has a moderate mutation rate.
It means that the only way to perpetuate a pandemic would be to drive it with “vaccines” — because naturally-acquired immunity is twice as strong as “vaccine-induced” immunity.
Using unjabbed people who got COVID and recovered, Goldberg et al. even found 6-fold differences in attack rates in double-dosed Israelis compared to 0 doses, if you begin looking at Month 4:
At 4-6 months:
0-dosed = 10.5 per 100,000 person-days at risk
2-dosed = 69.4 per 100,000 person-days at risk
[ratio = 6.6]At 6-8 months:
0-dosed = 14.0 per 100,000 person-days at risk
2-dosed = 88.9 per 100,000 person-days at risk
[ratio = 6.4]
The naturally-acquired immunity (0 doses) was 6 times higher than the immunity you get from being doubled-dosed.
Evidence suggest that COVID jabs were required in order to fuel the pandemic, because it would have fizzled out within about 12 months time, if there had not been a COVID jab.
Reference
[attack rates up to 50% higher if jabbed] — Shrestha NK, Burke PC, Nowacki AS, Simon JF, Hagen A, Gordon SM. Effectiveness of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Bivalent Vaccine. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Apr 19;10(6):ofad209. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad209. PMID: 37274183; PMCID: PMC10234376. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37274183/
[attack rates 6-fold (500% increase) higher if double-dosed are evaluated at Month 4 and beyond] — Goldberg Y, Mandel M, Bar-On YM, Bodenheimer O, Freedman LS, Ash N, Alroy-Preis S, Huppert A, Milo R. Protection and Waning of Natural and Hybrid Immunity to SARS-CoV-2. N Engl J Med. 2022 Jun 9;386(23):2201-2212. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2118946. Epub 2022 May 25. PMID: 35613036; PMCID: PMC9165562. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35613036/
I'm already wondering how these jabbed will get on this autumn/winter.