One narrative surrounding the COVID fiasco is that officials innocently didn’t know that the public policy initiatives they promoted or enforced — such as lockdowns, mask mandates, and “vaccine” mandates — would cause net harm to human beings.
They may not have known the prospects of their choice, but they had to try “something.”
A competing narrative is that the officials were compromised by a third party, such as by Bill Gates and his fellow travelers — so that, no matter what, they were all going to be choosing the same, failed policies, regardless of the real-world evidence on the ground.
CNN lists out 218 regions of the world where there has been a rollout of COVID jabs.
The $64,000 Question
What is the chance of 218 governments choosing the same path, when exploring alternatives while supposedly in an innocent state of ignorance about a new disease?
If you grant a 50/50 chance of success for a given intervention, or more directly a 50% chance that an official chooses it as an option while operating under naive ignorance, the problem reduces to a binomial experiment such as the flip of a coin.
That chance is the probability of innocence for government officials, it’s the probability that they weren’t colluding to act in unison with each other against the people of the world.
Probabilities range from 0 to 1, and an example of a high probability is .999 and an example of a low probability is .001.
Here is the probability of innocence for government officials who pushed forward on mandates (it’s the probability of “all heads” in 218 coin flips):
0.00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 24
And the corresponding probability that they are guilty of colluding to act unison with each other against the people of the world:
0.99999 99999 99999 99999 99999 99999 99999 99999 99999 99999 99999 99999 99999 76
Even relaxing assumptions to allow for a 60% baseline chance of choosing mandates still leads to an overwhelming probability of guilt for government officials. It’s just too rare for 218 things to align (e.g., 218 coin flips, 218 heads-of-state choosing the same path, etc.) like they did.
Yes.
Their decisions prove the criminality of this Plandemonium. Their Lockstep proves the conspiracy.
No coin is THAT psychopathic.
Still, thought-terminating circuit-breakers long since installed will trigger in the minds of most, even when the criminality is couched as you did. In pure probabilistic terms. Even with evidence of a grand criminal conspiracy the programming still holds. CIA got a lot of mileage out of 'Conspiracy Theorist', that is for sure!
It becomes worse when you drill down within a nation, into the Organs and businesses. Who pays a bounty to a hospital, to use a given drug, which is lethal? Who pays for a burial of a vaaxx-killed family member, on the condition that there is no autopsy? Who waves through a Gene Therapy trial based on a vaccine trial template? Who mandates a 'jab' for children not at any risk from the 'pathogen?'
Every Organ is guilty.
Peace.