Note: Happy Thanksgiving, readers. Please take some time today to inculcate a sense of gratitude, despite the COVID “horror show” that we’ve been subjected to for the last few years.
For a holiday special, this Substack offers not one, but two, more examples which show that the cumulative weight of publicly-available evidence lies in support of vaccine mediated enhanced disease (VMED) — or at least that COVID jabs are causing net harm to society.
Not ALL publicly-available evidence points to net harm from the COVID jabs, but most of it does, when analyzed correctly.
Vietnam
A case in point is Vietnam. Using the OWID website in the references below, you can obtain the worldwide data on COVID jab administration. The median daily rate of COVID jabs turned out to be 0.12% of the population, worldwide, getting jabbed per day.
Vietnam didn’t surpass the world median rate of COVID injections until 19 Jun 2021, and only consistently so after 28 Jul 2021:
From the summer of 2021 going forward in time, Vietnam stayed above the median daily rate of COVID jabs for almost 70 weeks before dipping below the median by November of 2022:
A testable hypothesis with regard to whether COVID injections cause net harm to society would take into account the daily rate of administration of COVID jabs along with the average daily excess death rate.
Low levels or no COVID injections would be expected to be paired with low excess death rates. High rates of COVID injections would be expected to be paired with high excess death rates.
If the COVID injections harm people instead of helping them, then it’d be expected that excess death rates would be higher while COVID jab rates are above the median rate for the world.
In Vietnam, hardly any excess death at all occurred prior to the administration of COVID “vaccines.” But while Vietnam engaged in almost 70 weeks of high COVID jab rates, their excess death rates remained elevated:
Vietnam is one of the “most-vaccinated” nations on Earth, so having 70 weeks of persistently-high excess death rates means that there is a strong indication to revisit the “vaccine-as-solution” mantra which we’ve heard from government and medical officials.
To recap, before COVID “vaccines” were in use in Vietnam, hardly any excess death was seen — after the “vaccines” were in high use, then persistently high excess death rates were seen.
Uruguay
Another place which experienced a huge jump in excess death rates after administering the COVID jabs is Uruguay. Uruguay surpassed the median daily rate of COVID jabs on 1 Mar 2021, but only remained above the median jab rate for about 52 weeks, or about a year:
Spending less time above the median jab rate spared them in terms of having lengthy excess death rates — such as the 70 straight weeks of high excess death in Vietnam — but the absolute rate of excess death peaked out even higher in Uruguay:
The amount of time that you maintain daily jab rates of 1% or more of the population appears to be related to the length of the excess death seen following such a high rate of “vaccine administration” — as Vietnam spent more time at daily population jab rates of “1% or more” than Uruguay did.
But the peak excess death rate in Uruguay is notable for being higher than the average daily death rate seen in World War I and even in the 1918 Spanish Flu. For those worst 4 weeks in Uruguay, the excess death rate was over 70% as high as the average NAZI kill rate during the Holocaust:
The weight of evidence both for and against the COVID jabs suggests that they should be stopped, especially now that the dominant variant of COVID in circulation (Omicron) is relatively harmless compared to even the seasonal flu.
Reference
[Daily jab rates as a percentage of the population] — OWID. https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations
[Estimated daily excess deaths per 100,000] — OWID. https://ourworldindata.org/excess-mortality-covid