NOTE: This post was inspired by a report of Dr. Meryl Nass giving a presentation in Japan that involved mention of the 100 Days Mission.
In order to gain control over the movement of all citizens, you could invent a special vaccine passport and then scare the public into taking new vaccine products by using PCR tests which have a high false-positive rate: giving the appearance of an epidemic. But because people develop natural immunity, then you’ll want new diseases often.
With new diseases often, you can then make new vaccine products often, always keeping the public one step behind so that they have to obtain permission for travel by taking the latest, up-to-date, vaccine product. A program that would work well for population control would be one where there is a new vaccine product every 100 days:
If linked to BioSecurity in the form of a “vaccine passport” — the 100 Days Mission would give elites control over the masses. Last year, a company which produced a COVID “vaccine product” which was 29 times more dangerous than typical vaccines, Moderna (32.6 death reports to VAERS per million doses), joined in on the effort:
[click to enlarge]
But the history of approval of new medical products reveals that a proper time of research and development and testing is 29 times longer than the 100 days of the 100 Days Mission (e.g., the 2922 days which are included in an 8-year time-window):
[click to enlarge]
At far right in the image above is the Phase 3 trial period, lasting for 3 years (from Year 6 to Year 8). History has taught us that having a trial that lasts 3 years is essential to uncover the latent adverse effects of new products, such as new vaccines. When a new vaccine was created for Dengue Fever, it didn’t show negative effects until Year 3:
In cell D14 of the spreadsheet above, the hospitalization rate for Dengue Fever in Year 3 in children under age 6 was found to be 5 times the hospitalization rate for kids in the control group — indicating vaccine-mediated enhanced disease (VMED). 20 of 2029 vaccinated kids were hospitalized that year, but only 2 of 1005 control kids were.
The history of medical practice reveals that those pushing for the 100 Days Mission are both reckless and irresponsible — and that it’d be dangerous if they move forward.
Feasibility of the notion of a new shot every 100 days
Doctors have already gone on the record about how, in some cases at least, they may advise someone to get recurrent “vaccine product” shots every 100 days:
Reference
[Phase 3 trials are supposed to take 3 years in order to uncover latent adverse effects] — Lipsky MS, Sharp LK. From idea to market: the drug approval process. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2001 Sep-Oct;14(5):362-7. PMID: 11572541. https://www.jabfm.org/content/jabfp/14/5/362.full.pdf
[VAERS reporting rates indicate that Moderna was 29 times more dangerous than typical vaccines] —