In this prior report, the range of plausibility on the infection fatality rate (IFR) for Alpha variant COVID was discovered. But after re-watching Dr.'s Dan Erikson and Artin Massihi make a permanent record out of early COVID numbers (a wise thing for them to do), I had to re-run the simulation to check for feasibility of what they said.
To recap, by late April in California, there had been 281,000 COVID tests with 33,865 confirmed positives — which is a test positivity rate of 12%. Applied to California’s population of 39.5 million, that makes for 4.74 million COVID infections. But at the time, only 1,227 COVID deaths had been recorded (~1 death per 3,863 infections).
But that is less lethal than seasonal flu, which can cause up to 1 death per 700 infections in a bad year. Using known death data from the UK Tech Briefing #5, I was able to discover the limits on plausibility for a COVID IFR:
All of the plausible IFR values — those able to re-create the known UK death data — were between 0.13% and 0.20%. At 0.13%, there is one death per 769 infections. At 0.20%, there is 1 death per 500 infections.
One explanation for why UK death was higher than early California death would be the difference in baseline vitamin D levels. The British are notorious for having deficient and unhealthy vitamin D levels, making them more susceptible to respiratory infection and death.
Either way, it is not plausible that COVID was ever twice as lethal as seasonal flu.
Reference
[As of 19 Jan 2021, from 117,000 COVID infections, there were 169 deaths by Day 28 (corrected to 190 total deaths, by using upper bound estimates from Linton et. al.)] — Page 3. Epidemiological findings. UK Technical Briefing #5. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/investigation-of-novel-sars-cov-2-variant-variant-of-concern-20201201
[“Time-to-death” model for COVID; 89% of death occurs by Day 28 using the 95% UB of both the mean and SD of the lognormal model that fit the actual deaths best] — Linton NM, Kobayashi T, Yang Y, et al. Incubation Period and Other Epidemiological Characteristics of 2019 Novel Coronavirus Infections with Right Truncation: A Statistical Analysis of Publicly Available Case Data. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020 Feb;9(2). DOI: 10.3390/jcm9020538. PMID: 32079150; PMCID: PMC7074197. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7074197/
[What level of evidence it takes to make it appropriate to talk about something as being, for at least practical purposes, “proven”] — A Few Things You Should Know About Paternity Tests (But Were Afraid to Ask). https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=2024&context=lawreview
[Imperial College model using an evidence-contradicting IFR of 0.9%] — Imperial College COVID-19 Response Team. Report 9: Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID-19 mortality and healthcare demand. https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf
Only random testing numbers are usable. Most people wait until they have symptoms to test skewing the results, positive results in testing numbers can be 2-50 times higher than the percentages of positives in the general population, depending on how common the symptoms are. This number can be easily ascertained with simple controlled studies but it can vary greatly from city to city based on the popularity of testing in the culture and the requirements for testing at various major employers.