Thanks for what you've done to help the truth get out, Steve.
As you can see, I operate by the philosophy: "If you can't be the light, be the mirror."
I'm not exceptionally smart (i.e., genius-level, like the Big Names are), and nor am I privy to insider details, but I do have a knack for chewing on data to see what happens when it is thoroughly digested.
In retrospect to the above analysis, a single confidence interval which did not include the equal split (50% of deaths in first 381 days; 50% after) would suffice as evidence of a temporal shift -- implying that the jabs were accelerating the deaths.
Isn’t it great? What happens when you set the data free so that everyone can analyze the data?
It’s a mystery to me why the CDC is keeping the Medicare data under wraps.
I just released a good portion of it, and nobody has complained to me about a privacy violation
Thanks for what you've done to help the truth get out, Steve.
As you can see, I operate by the philosophy: "If you can't be the light, be the mirror."
I'm not exceptionally smart (i.e., genius-level, like the Big Names are), and nor am I privy to insider details, but I do have a knack for chewing on data to see what happens when it is thoroughly digested.
In retrospect to the above analysis, a single confidence interval which did not include the equal split (50% of deaths in first 381 days; 50% after) would suffice as evidence of a temporal shift -- implying that the jabs were accelerating the deaths.