Causing permanent disabilities. In the USA, the majority of children and young adults have chronic illnesses (54%) and this is tied to vaccination, as proven by at least 5 studies comparing vaxxed with unvaxxed.
3 examples (there are many more, like the flu shot):
1. FDA and EMA fast-tracked HPV vaccines were removed from vaccine schedule in Japan (Jun 2013), India and Peru, after careful analysis by expert doctors of a huge number of clinical records of girls becoming permanent disabled after vaccination1, thousands on wheelchairs or bedridden2.
RFK: “In 2014, the Gates Foundation funded tests of experimental HPV vaccines, developed by GSK and Merck, on 23,000 young girls in remote Indian provinces. Approximately 1,200 suffered severe side effects, including autoimmune and fertility disorders. Seven died. Indian government investigations charged that Gates funded researchers committed pervasive ethical violations: pressuring vulnerable village girls into the trial, bullying parents, forging consent forms, and refusing medical care to the injured girls. The case is now in the country’s Supreme Court.”
Official documents recognize that governments pretend to vax male pre-pubescent children to use them as future human shields for girls when they become sexually active, while assuming all end up affected by promiscuity (some may engage in lifelong fidelity, others will screen before sex, a few, may never have sexual interactions). They say HPV male cancer justifies this. Yet, the epidemiological records are so low that it is clear that the main purpose is indirect protection, a concept which is completely unethical when considering severe side effects, even if they were statistically insignificant (which are not).
Also, cost-benefit analysis clearly show HPV vaccination is a waste of resources and a clear proof of “deep state” government corruption: even if they were eventually effective (it would take over 10 years to prove there was no ecological niche effect), women still need to act as if unvaccinated, and take yearly pap tests, since vaccines don’t cover 30 HPV carcinogenic strains.
2. Vaccines made from cancerous human cell-lines, obtained from live butchered babies in procured abortions3, contaminated with human DNA, even in excess of 2000% of the FDA 10 ng. limit, cause brain damage and even autism4 (exponential growth with 14 matching change points in 14 different countries in 14 different moments)5, with higher impact in African descent6, as proven in 2004 by the CDC (an then censored).
US Government officially recognizes, to the point of compensating with 1,500,000 dollars each child, that vaccination could trigger autism in children with prior mitochondrial diseases. 7 Of course, there are no requirements to mitochondrial assessment before vaccination: Big Pharma makes a profit while Big Government says it pays the damages (it doesn’t, since it’s so hard to prove).
No brainer: during the pandemic vaccination nearly halted completely... therefore less autism… and it wasn’t because of less diagnosis: “2 high-quality, multi-million dollar studies in California (Byrd et al., 20028; Hertz-Picciotto&Delwiche, 20099) both concluded that better awareness, changes in diagnostic criteria and earlier age of diagnosis only explain a small fraction of the rise in autism. Corroborated in 2019.10 The fact that the CDC is still refusing to properly investigate autism causation is outrageous.” Autism has higher incidence in non-whites. 11 It only proves why they buried the Hooker study linking MMR with autism, especially in African Americans and babies with other problems (700%+).
Professor Chris Exley analysed brain tissue from those who died with autism: found massive amounts of aluminium in neurons. What if due to those new vaccines, the body became unable to regulate aluminium absorption and/or disposition, leading to accumulation in the brain?
3. Why are many governments giving all newly born babies a compulsory unjustified “medicine” against a sexually transmitted infection (STI) which cause brain injury? Hepatitis B vaccines made from foetal cell-lines are a clear example of unethical "over-zealous" treatment, i.e. “medical procedures that are burdensome, dangerous, extraordinary, or disproportionate to the expected outcome”12: corporate greed funnels government leeching and medical corruption even to the point of therapeutic cruelty? Government collusion without a money trail shows there’s more than that: depopulation.
Gender dysphoria
Glyphosate, is an endocrine disruptor present in vaccines as a contaminant.13 Though in trace amounts, it could trigger a hormonal auto-immune reaction, which could be reinforced by glyphosate present in food.
Opposite sex aborted fetal tissue cells in vaccines derived from aborted babies, present in many vaccines introduced within the first year of life: MRC-5 is a male and WI-38 is a female cell line. 14
It’s not a coincide that the vast majority of transitioning boys are autistic: maybe haccines are now designed for that purpose.
In 2016-2017 a group in Italy tested a variety of vaccines from different lots and manufacturers. They tested them to figure out a possible reason why some people had adverse reactions. They tested HPV vaccines, influenza, pneumococcal, meningitis, tetanus, DTaP, MMR, etc...
Here are quotes from the article I linked:
"It is a matter of fact that every day millions of vaccine doses are
administered and nothing notable happens, but it is also irrefutable
that, regardless of the amount of side effects that are not recorded and the percentage of which remains in fact unknown, in a limited number cases something wrong occurs. No satisfactory explanation or, in many cases, no explanation at all has been given and it seems that those adverse effects happen on a random and stochastic basis. Those situations induced us to verify the safety of vaccines from a point of view which was never adopted before: not a biological, but a physical approach. So, we developed a new analysis method based on the use of a Field Emission Gun Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope investigations to detect possible physical contamination in those products. The quantity of foreign bodies detected and, in some cases, their unusual chemical compositions baffled us. The inorganic particles identified are neither biocompatible nor biodegradable, that means that
they are biopersistent and can induce effects that can become evident
either immediately close to injection time or after a certain time from
administration. It is important to remember that particles (crystals and
not molecules) are bodies foreign to the organism and they behave as
such. More in particular, their toxicity is in some respects different from that of the chemical elements composing them, adding to that
toxicity which, in any case, is still there, that typical of foreign bodies.
For that reason, they induce an inflammatory reaction. After being injected, those microparticles, nanoparticles and aggregates can stay around the injection site forming swellings and granulomas. But they can also be carried by the blood circulation, escaping any attempt to guess what will be their final destination. We believe that in many cases they get distributed throughout the body without causing any visible reaction, but it is also likely that, in some circumstances, they reach some organ, none excluded and including the microbiota, in a fair quantity. As happens with all foreign bodies, particularly that small, they induce an inflammatory reaction that is chronic because most of those particles cannot be degraded. Furthermore, the protein-corona effect (due to a nano-
bio-interaction18 ) can produce organic/inorganic composite particles
capable of stimulating the immune system in an undesirable way.
It is impossible not to add that particles the size often observed in
vaccines can enter cell nuclei and interact with the DNA. Given the contaminations we observed in all samples of human use vaccines, adverse effects after the injection of those vaccines are possible and credible and have the character of randomness, since they depend on where the contaminants are carried by the blood circulation. It is only obvious that similar quantities of these foreign bodies can have a more serious impact on very small organisms like those of children. Their presence in the muscles, due an extravasation from the blood, could heavily impair the muscle functionality. We come across particles with chemical compositions, similar to those found in the vaccines we analyzed, when we study cases of
environmental contamination caused by different pollution sources. In most circumstances, the combinations detected are very odd as they
have no technical use, cannot be found in any material handbook and
look like the result of the random formation occurring, for example,
when waste is burnt. In any case, whatever their origin, they should not be present in any injectable medicament, let alone in vaccines, more in particular those meant for infants. Other forms of so-far unknown contaminations have recently been observed and, in any case, vaccines contain components that could themselves be the cause of adverse effects. It is a well-known fact in toxicology that contaminants exert a mutual, synergic effect,and as the number of contaminants increases, the effects grow less and less
predictable. The more so when some substances are unknown. As a matter of fact, no exhaustive and reliable official data exist on the side-effects induced by vaccines. The episodic evidence reported by people allegedly damaged by vaccines is twofold: some say the damage occurred and became visible within a few hours from administration, and some maintain that it was a matter of some weeks. Though we have no indisputable evidence as to the reliability of those attestations, we can put forward a hypothesis to explain the different phenomena. In the former case, the pollutants contained in the drug have reached the brain and, depending on the anatomical site interested, have induced a reaction. If that is the case, the whole phenomenon is very rapid. In the latter circumstance, the pollutants reached the microbiota, thus interfering with the production of enzymes necessary to carry out neurological functions."
Yep, and the Corverlva.it study used an animal vaccine as comparison-control: it came out clean. They are not after our animals, yet, just obsessed by exterminating us, the useless eaters:
Gates-WHO: vaccines can’t reduce population, except by murdering
Proof: reducing infant mortality, can’t reduce population growth!
Handicapping vaccines
Causing permanent disabilities. In the USA, the majority of children and young adults have chronic illnesses (54%) and this is tied to vaccination, as proven by at least 5 studies comparing vaxxed with unvaxxed.
3 examples (there are many more, like the flu shot):
1. FDA and EMA fast-tracked HPV vaccines were removed from vaccine schedule in Japan (Jun 2013), India and Peru, after careful analysis by expert doctors of a huge number of clinical records of girls becoming permanent disabled after vaccination1, thousands on wheelchairs or bedridden2.
RFK: “In 2014, the Gates Foundation funded tests of experimental HPV vaccines, developed by GSK and Merck, on 23,000 young girls in remote Indian provinces. Approximately 1,200 suffered severe side effects, including autoimmune and fertility disorders. Seven died. Indian government investigations charged that Gates funded researchers committed pervasive ethical violations: pressuring vulnerable village girls into the trial, bullying parents, forging consent forms, and refusing medical care to the injured girls. The case is now in the country’s Supreme Court.”
Official documents recognize that governments pretend to vax male pre-pubescent children to use them as future human shields for girls when they become sexually active, while assuming all end up affected by promiscuity (some may engage in lifelong fidelity, others will screen before sex, a few, may never have sexual interactions). They say HPV male cancer justifies this. Yet, the epidemiological records are so low that it is clear that the main purpose is indirect protection, a concept which is completely unethical when considering severe side effects, even if they were statistically insignificant (which are not).
Also, cost-benefit analysis clearly show HPV vaccination is a waste of resources and a clear proof of “deep state” government corruption: even if they were eventually effective (it would take over 10 years to prove there was no ecological niche effect), women still need to act as if unvaccinated, and take yearly pap tests, since vaccines don’t cover 30 HPV carcinogenic strains.
2. Vaccines made from cancerous human cell-lines, obtained from live butchered babies in procured abortions3, contaminated with human DNA, even in excess of 2000% of the FDA 10 ng. limit, cause brain damage and even autism4 (exponential growth with 14 matching change points in 14 different countries in 14 different moments)5, with higher impact in African descent6, as proven in 2004 by the CDC (an then censored).
Source: https://doi.org/10.5897/JPHE2014.0649
US Government officially recognizes, to the point of compensating with 1,500,000 dollars each child, that vaccination could trigger autism in children with prior mitochondrial diseases. 7 Of course, there are no requirements to mitochondrial assessment before vaccination: Big Pharma makes a profit while Big Government says it pays the damages (it doesn’t, since it’s so hard to prove).
https://www.gizmodo.com.au/2011/02/bill-gates-says-its-an-absolute-lie-to-link-vaccines-and-autism/
No brainer: during the pandemic vaccination nearly halted completely... therefore less autism… and it wasn’t because of less diagnosis: “2 high-quality, multi-million dollar studies in California (Byrd et al., 20028; Hertz-Picciotto&Delwiche, 20099) both concluded that better awareness, changes in diagnostic criteria and earlier age of diagnosis only explain a small fraction of the rise in autism. Corroborated in 2019.10 The fact that the CDC is still refusing to properly investigate autism causation is outrageous.” Autism has higher incidence in non-whites. 11 It only proves why they buried the Hooker study linking MMR with autism, especially in African Americans and babies with other problems (700%+).
Professor Chris Exley analysed brain tissue from those who died with autism: found massive amounts of aluminium in neurons. What if due to those new vaccines, the body became unable to regulate aluminium absorption and/or disposition, leading to accumulation in the brain?
3. Why are many governments giving all newly born babies a compulsory unjustified “medicine” against a sexually transmitted infection (STI) which cause brain injury? Hepatitis B vaccines made from foetal cell-lines are a clear example of unethical "over-zealous" treatment, i.e. “medical procedures that are burdensome, dangerous, extraordinary, or disproportionate to the expected outcome”12: corporate greed funnels government leeching and medical corruption even to the point of therapeutic cruelty? Government collusion without a money trail shows there’s more than that: depopulation.
Gender dysphoria
Glyphosate, is an endocrine disruptor present in vaccines as a contaminant.13 Though in trace amounts, it could trigger a hormonal auto-immune reaction, which could be reinforced by glyphosate present in food.
Opposite sex aborted fetal tissue cells in vaccines derived from aborted babies, present in many vaccines introduced within the first year of life: MRC-5 is a male and WI-38 is a female cell line. 14
It’s not a coincide that the vast majority of transitioning boys are autistic: maybe haccines are now designed for that purpose.
FREE “wake-up” MOVIES !
15 million watched the first one in 3 days!
Watch as if your lives depended on it: literally!
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/wake-up-videos
2035 You'll go nowhere and you'll be happy =(
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/2050-youll-go-nowhere-and-youll-be
16 laws we need to exit Prison Planet
Politics got us in, politics is the way out ... after prayers!
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/laws-to-exit-planet-prison
In 2016-2017 a group in Italy tested a variety of vaccines from different lots and manufacturers. They tested them to figure out a possible reason why some people had adverse reactions. They tested HPV vaccines, influenza, pneumococcal, meningitis, tetanus, DTaP, MMR, etc...
Here are quotes from the article I linked:
"It is a matter of fact that every day millions of vaccine doses are
administered and nothing notable happens, but it is also irrefutable
that, regardless of the amount of side effects that are not recorded and the percentage of which remains in fact unknown, in a limited number cases something wrong occurs. No satisfactory explanation or, in many cases, no explanation at all has been given and it seems that those adverse effects happen on a random and stochastic basis. Those situations induced us to verify the safety of vaccines from a point of view which was never adopted before: not a biological, but a physical approach. So, we developed a new analysis method based on the use of a Field Emission Gun Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope investigations to detect possible physical contamination in those products. The quantity of foreign bodies detected and, in some cases, their unusual chemical compositions baffled us. The inorganic particles identified are neither biocompatible nor biodegradable, that means that
they are biopersistent and can induce effects that can become evident
either immediately close to injection time or after a certain time from
administration. It is important to remember that particles (crystals and
not molecules) are bodies foreign to the organism and they behave as
such. More in particular, their toxicity is in some respects different from that of the chemical elements composing them, adding to that
toxicity which, in any case, is still there, that typical of foreign bodies.
For that reason, they induce an inflammatory reaction. After being injected, those microparticles, nanoparticles and aggregates can stay around the injection site forming swellings and granulomas. But they can also be carried by the blood circulation, escaping any attempt to guess what will be their final destination. We believe that in many cases they get distributed throughout the body without causing any visible reaction, but it is also likely that, in some circumstances, they reach some organ, none excluded and including the microbiota, in a fair quantity. As happens with all foreign bodies, particularly that small, they induce an inflammatory reaction that is chronic because most of those particles cannot be degraded. Furthermore, the protein-corona effect (due to a nano-
bio-interaction18 ) can produce organic/inorganic composite particles
capable of stimulating the immune system in an undesirable way.
It is impossible not to add that particles the size often observed in
vaccines can enter cell nuclei and interact with the DNA. Given the contaminations we observed in all samples of human use vaccines, adverse effects after the injection of those vaccines are possible and credible and have the character of randomness, since they depend on where the contaminants are carried by the blood circulation. It is only obvious that similar quantities of these foreign bodies can have a more serious impact on very small organisms like those of children. Their presence in the muscles, due an extravasation from the blood, could heavily impair the muscle functionality. We come across particles with chemical compositions, similar to those found in the vaccines we analyzed, when we study cases of
environmental contamination caused by different pollution sources. In most circumstances, the combinations detected are very odd as they
have no technical use, cannot be found in any material handbook and
look like the result of the random formation occurring, for example,
when waste is burnt. In any case, whatever their origin, they should not be present in any injectable medicament, let alone in vaccines, more in particular those meant for infants. Other forms of so-far unknown contaminations have recently been observed and, in any case, vaccines contain components that could themselves be the cause of adverse effects. It is a well-known fact in toxicology that contaminants exert a mutual, synergic effect,and as the number of contaminants increases, the effects grow less and less
predictable. The more so when some substances are unknown. As a matter of fact, no exhaustive and reliable official data exist on the side-effects induced by vaccines. The episodic evidence reported by people allegedly damaged by vaccines is twofold: some say the damage occurred and became visible within a few hours from administration, and some maintain that it was a matter of some weeks. Though we have no indisputable evidence as to the reliability of those attestations, we can put forward a hypothesis to explain the different phenomena. In the former case, the pollutants contained in the drug have reached the brain and, depending on the anatomical site interested, have induced a reaction. If that is the case, the whole phenomenon is very rapid. In the latter circumstance, the pollutants reached the microbiota, thus interfering with the production of enzymes necessary to carry out neurological functions."
https://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/new-quality-control-investigations-on-vaccines-micro--and-nanocontamination.html
Yep, and the Corverlva.it study used an animal vaccine as comparison-control: it came out clean. They are not after our animals, yet, just obsessed by exterminating us, the useless eaters:
Gates-WHO: vaccines can’t reduce population, except by murdering
Proof: reducing infant mortality, can’t reduce population growth!
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/depop-vaccines-no-myth