It looks like you disagree, Fabian, but you have not presented a good argument against the points I made.
To have made a good argument would have required for you to be able to address at least most of the points made -- possibly even coming up with an even better explanation of the facts. But all you have done is present two points superficially -- without expounding on how they undercut the points I made.
It looks like you disagree, Fabian, but you have not presented a good argument against the points I made.
To have made a good argument would have required for you to be able to address at least most of the points made -- possibly even coming up with an even better explanation of the facts. But all you have done is present two points superficially -- without expounding on how they undercut the points I made.
Take up philosophy, seriously.