The Vigilant Fox recently reported on evidence brought forth by Daily Clout regarding the full death data in the Pfizer phase 3 trial. The FDA VRBPAC meeting took place on 10 Dec 2020, and it was a crucial meeting that led to the EUA for Pfizer on the very next day (11 Dec 2020). But paper trails show that Pfizer didn’t reveal known deaths:
Only 2 of the 8 known Pfizer-group deaths got relayed to the VRBPAC group by Pfizer representatives. And the circumstances of the 6 Pfizer-group deaths that had involved the circulatory system indicate a safety signal — all 6 may be presumed sudden deaths. When someone gets found dead, the most likely death is a sudden one.
Being sudden, they wouldn’t be able to make a call for help, for instance. Here are the deaths from the placebo-group:
The numbers at left indicate the order of the deaths, chronologically. The 8th death, while occurring on 1 Dec 2020, does not have paperwork that could prove that Pfizer knew about it prior to the crucial 10 Dec 2020 VRBPAC meeting. Pfizer ended up reporting deaths 1, 2, 4, and 5 by the time of the VRBPAC meeting.
Notice how a lower proportion of the deaths in the placebo arm would be characterized as “sudden death” compared to the 75% of all deaths in the Pfizer arm. Evidence shows that Pfizer — by not updating death data for the 10 Dec 2020 VRBPAC meeting — engaged in “concealment of a material fact” which is a type of fraud.
Reference
[Daily Clout update] — https://dailyclout.io/pfizer-did-not-disclose-a-kansas-vaccinated-sudden-cardiac-death-from-its-covid-19-clinical-trial-dr-jeyanthi-kunadhasans-letter-to-kansas-attorney-general-kris-kobach/
[initial Daily Clout report] — https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/86/224
Concealment of a significant material fact sounds like fraud to me. That could end the liability protection of the PREP act and open the gate for lawsuits. Let’s go! This is stronger than the SV-40 argument, but the two together are very strong. So far Pfizer’s legal argument has been that the FDA late found out and did nothing and so it wasn’t Pfizer’s fraud that hurt people, it was the FDA’s lack of enforcement that hurt people. When did Pfizer reveal this to the FDA? 2022 they might get off the hook. 2024 we are golden to sue. 2023 looks promising too.
Thank you very much!
Some may know (e.g. from this export opinion:
https://kremer.tentary.com/p/GNV9M3)
that this does not surprise me anyhow.
I made several analyses indicating that far too few deaths "occurred" before the EUA. But too many were reported "later".
There was this nonsense-diagnosis "arteriosclerosis", in fact a sudden death that occurred in fact 1-3 days after the first injection; classified as "not related" against the protocol rules. They could not totally deny or eradicate this case because the police had found the man and reported this to the clinic. They invented the nonsense "arteriosclerosis" then, maybe because this would be acceptable and nice for the manufacturer of atorvastatin.
Note that this particular case was the only ! one ! among about 38k modRNA recipients in both RCTs together who were reported to have died within 14 days of either active injection!
This is a ridiculous lie!
Overall, all death and SAE-counts and some particular AE counts (e.g. menstruation disorders) of both RCTs have nothing to do with reality but hiding cases. Most, but not all, by cases "randomised but not exposed".
Expert Opinion on Spikevax for the time being only in German:
https://kremer.tentary.com/p/snSQiH