Concealment of a significant material fact sounds like fraud to me. That could end the liability protection of the PREP act and open the gate for lawsuits. Let’s go! This is stronger than the SV-40 argument, but the two together are very strong. So far Pfizer’s legal argument has been that the FDA late found out and did nothing and so it wasn’t Pfizer’s fraud that hurt people, it was the FDA’s lack of enforcement that hurt people. When did Pfizer reveal this to the FDA? 2022 they might get off the hook. 2024 we are golden to sue. 2023 looks promising too.
Bill, you bring up a good point. The possibility of FDA and Pfizer conspiring together against the American public -- such as if FDA officials knew, by 10 Dec 2020, about all 8 Pfizer-group deaths -- cannot be taken off of the table.
Each side, and at multiple levels, should be asked:
I made several analyses indicating that far too few deaths "occurred" before the EUA. But too many were reported "later".
There was this nonsense-diagnosis "arteriosclerosis", in fact a sudden death that occurred in fact 1-3 days after the first injection; classified as "not related" against the protocol rules. They could not totally deny or eradicate this case because the police had found the man and reported this to the clinic. They invented the nonsense "arteriosclerosis" then, maybe because this would be acceptable and nice for the manufacturer of atorvastatin.
Note that this particular case was the only ! one ! among about 38k modRNA recipients in both RCTs together who were reported to have died within 14 days of either active injection!
This is a ridiculous lie!
Overall, all death and SAE-counts and some particular AE counts (e.g. menstruation disorders) of both RCTs have nothing to do with reality but hiding cases. Most, but not all, by cases "randomised but not exposed".
Expert Opinion on Spikevax for the time being only in German:
Concealment of a significant material fact sounds like fraud to me. That could end the liability protection of the PREP act and open the gate for lawsuits. Let’s go! This is stronger than the SV-40 argument, but the two together are very strong. So far Pfizer’s legal argument has been that the FDA late found out and did nothing and so it wasn’t Pfizer’s fraud that hurt people, it was the FDA’s lack of enforcement that hurt people. When did Pfizer reveal this to the FDA? 2022 they might get off the hook. 2024 we are golden to sue. 2023 looks promising too.
Bill, you bring up a good point. The possibility of FDA and Pfizer conspiring together against the American public -- such as if FDA officials knew, by 10 Dec 2020, about all 8 Pfizer-group deaths -- cannot be taken off of the table.
Each side, and at multiple levels, should be asked:
"What did you know and when did you know it?"
Thank you very much!
Some may know (e.g. from this export opinion:
https://kremer.tentary.com/p/GNV9M3)
that this does not surprise me anyhow.
I made several analyses indicating that far too few deaths "occurred" before the EUA. But too many were reported "later".
There was this nonsense-diagnosis "arteriosclerosis", in fact a sudden death that occurred in fact 1-3 days after the first injection; classified as "not related" against the protocol rules. They could not totally deny or eradicate this case because the police had found the man and reported this to the clinic. They invented the nonsense "arteriosclerosis" then, maybe because this would be acceptable and nice for the manufacturer of atorvastatin.
Note that this particular case was the only ! one ! among about 38k modRNA recipients in both RCTs together who were reported to have died within 14 days of either active injection!
This is a ridiculous lie!
Overall, all death and SAE-counts and some particular AE counts (e.g. menstruation disorders) of both RCTs have nothing to do with reality but hiding cases. Most, but not all, by cases "randomised but not exposed".
Expert Opinion on Spikevax for the time being only in German:
https://kremer.tentary.com/p/snSQiH