Great article. There certainly was not 100% reporting to VAERS. I have read articles and seen video testimonies of multiple hospital employees who were forbidden to file VAERS reports under intense threats of immediate termination.
The pressure bearing down on those who might have otherwise reported the events makes the contrast in the numbers all the more astonishing. I only presented a situation with 100% reporting as a counterfactual, because even something so god-awfully-obvious as paralyzing polio -- coming on after you had just taken the polio vaccine the week or month before -- isn't even reported at an 80% rate, let alone at 100%.
These numbers can easily be attributed to an action, whereas medium and long term disablements certainly not reported as a vaccine injury, instead, put down to just bad luck.
Great article. There certainly was not 100% reporting to VAERS. I have read articles and seen video testimonies of multiple hospital employees who were forbidden to file VAERS reports under intense threats of immediate termination.
Bill,
The pressure bearing down on those who might have otherwise reported the events makes the contrast in the numbers all the more astonishing. I only presented a situation with 100% reporting as a counterfactual, because even something so god-awfully-obvious as paralyzing polio -- coming on after you had just taken the polio vaccine the week or month before -- isn't even reported at an 80% rate, let alone at 100%.
These numbers can easily be attributed to an action, whereas medium and long term disablements certainly not reported as a vaccine injury, instead, put down to just bad luck.