Even using their numbers, it takes over 10 million dollars to prevent one hospitalization -- while things like vitamin D can do that job for just a few thousand.
It is just like they intentionally wanted to minimize the cost-efficiency, in order to make more money on the back end of things.
So in other words, safe and effective??!
While "safe" can be ruled out by the evidence, the word "effective" depends on your underlying goal, HKP.
:-)
Sadly we both now know beyond any shadow of a doubt “effective” in that context solely means intentional harms.
Have you seen my Belated Excess Deaths post, HKP?
I read the first two parts and now I see you just posted a third. Thanks
And maximizing profit, very effective
Good point, Craig
Even using their numbers, it takes over 10 million dollars to prevent one hospitalization -- while things like vitamin D can do that job for just a few thousand.
It is just like they intentionally wanted to minimize the cost-efficiency, in order to make more money on the back end of things.