Dane, there are at least 3 leverage points in the CDC "COVID-associated" data that can produce the apparent 10-fold effect (the unjabbed were 10 times as likely to die with COVID as the jabbed).
1) wait a few weeks before calling someone jabbed
2) preferentially record unjabbed deaths as "COVID associated"
3) once hospitalized, treat them different (eg, withhold nutrition from those unjabbed)
Thank you for responding! I agree, and they are very good at hiding those factors.
This CDC shows mortality benefit of bivalent booster. I don’t believe it but can’t figure out the flaws. Ideas? https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/72/wr/mm7206a3.htm?s_cid=mm7206a3_x
Dane, there are at least 3 leverage points in the CDC "COVID-associated" data that can produce the apparent 10-fold effect (the unjabbed were 10 times as likely to die with COVID as the jabbed).
1) wait a few weeks before calling someone jabbed
2) preferentially record unjabbed deaths as "COVID associated"
3) once hospitalized, treat them different (eg, withhold nutrition from those unjabbed)