That's a good point and I'll append the Substack to make it clear to readers that data were for deaths only. But even just looking at deaths, there'd be an expected distribution of age-at-death, and that would at least roughly guide expectation.
The fuzzy part is to reduce all of these deaths to a single value, because that's theoretical reasoning. The Social Security data is for an individual of age 71, not for a group of 100,000 people who got jabbed at a mean age of 71.
I'm comparing the expectation for a single person to the expectation for an average of persons, and that's admittedly exploratory rather than conclusive. I'd need to know the fraction of the total that these deaths made up to become more conclusive.
The database provided is everyone under 80 who was jabbed and. Died before Feb 1 2023.
So I don’t think you can draw conclusions about the age mix of people who were jabbed and did not die.
That's a good point and I'll append the Substack to make it clear to readers that data were for deaths only. But even just looking at deaths, there'd be an expected distribution of age-at-death, and that would at least roughly guide expectation.
The fuzzy part is to reduce all of these deaths to a single value, because that's theoretical reasoning. The Social Security data is for an individual of age 71, not for a group of 100,000 people who got jabbed at a mean age of 71.
I'm comparing the expectation for a single person to the expectation for an average of persons, and that's admittedly exploratory rather than conclusive. I'd need to know the fraction of the total that these deaths made up to become more conclusive.