NOTE: a graph of the reported age 18-39 death rates for 2022 can be found here.
Death rates move around a little, due to seasonal variation. When narrowing the focus to just one specific age-group, they move around a little more — but not much more. The highest age-specific coefficient of variation in US age groups was 9% of the mean (the standard deviation of death rates for those of age 25 to 34 was 9% of the mean).
When the coefficient of variation is 9% of the mean for age-specific death rates, then you pretty much never see one age-specific death rate, for a given month or year, that happens to be 100% higher than another one (for another month or year). It requires too many standard deviations of change.
When looking at those under age 25 in England, a typical finding is a yearly age-specific death rate of 40 per 100,000:
Death rates go up after that, so it would be expected that, if you were to look at the age group of 18-39 in England, then you would be guaranteed to find a death rate higher than 40 per 100,000 — even when drawing data just from individual months, and then annualizing it.
But look at what happened to those in the age group of 18-39 in England in December of 2022, when they refrained from being jabbed:
[click to enlarge]
For December of 2022, the UK government computed their annualized death rate at 14.8 per 100,000 (cell H985), but the crude rate derived from the death count two columns to the left — along with the person-years one column to the left — comes out at 13.4 yearly deaths per 100,000.
That’s only one-third of the expected average death rate for this age group. A tiny subset of drugs and natural compounds can make you more healthy, reducing deaths by natural causes. But the amount of reduction here is uncanny.
No drug or natural compound cuts a baseline, natural-cause death rate by two-thirds. Evidence suggests that the UK has discovered a “magic elixir” that is capable of cutting natural-cause death rates by two-thirds.
It bears mentioning that this is during December, when death rates are expected to run higher than average. This is something that is unprecedented in all of medical history.
It is safe to say that, before 2022, there has never been a December — at least in any nation in the Northern Hemisphere — when annualized death rates were only one-third of expected (i.e., two-thirds reduced).
Reference
[expected annualized death rate for those below age 40 is at least 40 per 100,000] — ONS. Causes of death over 100 years. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/articles/causesofdeathover100years/2017-09-18
[annualized death rate for December 2022 was less than 15 per 100,000] — ONS. Deaths by vaccination status, England. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/deathsbyvaccinationstatusengland
I read that, wrote a sarcastic remark about the data and archived it.
But to be serious instead, could they have fudged the data to hide a higher death rate in a larger bucket sized histogram? (I.e. Hypothetically hide the excess deaths)
I only suggest this because climate scientists correct the data all the time to make it fit the political narrative.