I read that, wrote a sarcastic remark about the data and archived it.
But to be serious instead, could they have fudged the data to hide a higher death rate in a larger bucket sized histogram? (I.e. Hypothetically hide the excess deaths)
I only suggest this because climate scientists correct the data all the time to make it fit the political narrative.
Jillian, I agree with you that it's very likely data fudgery here, because it borders on being biophysically impossible for this age group to die at the low rate of December 2022 (as I showed in the essay).
There aren't any real things (drugs, nutrients) that can cause the low death, so I called it magic.
I read that, wrote a sarcastic remark about the data and archived it.
But to be serious instead, could they have fudged the data to hide a higher death rate in a larger bucket sized histogram? (I.e. Hypothetically hide the excess deaths)
I only suggest this because climate scientists correct the data all the time to make it fit the political narrative.
Jillian, I agree with you that it's very likely data fudgery here, because it borders on being biophysically impossible for this age group to die at the low rate of December 2022 (as I showed in the essay).
There aren't any real things (drugs, nutrients) that can cause the low death, so I called it magic.